Archive for February 5th, 2008

Feb 05 2008

Barry Morse, 1918 - 2008

I am very sad to write that Barry Morse, a British/Canadian actor, has died.

He had a million roles in his long career, but readers of this blog no doubt remember him best as Professor Victor Bergman from "Space: 1999". He was the resident scientist of Moonbase Alpha in the show, and brought a wonderful warmth and humanity to the show.

This hits me for two reasons. One was that his character of the scientist was a huge role model for me when I was a young teenager. I was awkward, nerdy, and a major spazz. Bergman was thoughtful, generous, intelligent, and well-liked by the other characters. He was a major hero of mine.

And, in 2000, I met him, when I attended a Space:1999 convention in NYC as the guest scientist. I was thrilled to go, of course, since I was major fanboy. I got to sit on stage at the opening panel with the stars of the show!

me at the Space:1999 convention in 2000

That’s Barry on my right. At one point, I got to talk about how the show influenced me. Sitting next to Barry made me a little nervous, but I decided to tell him personally what a role model Bergman was for me. Especially since his character, when faced with something he didn’t understand, was never afraid to say "I don’t know". He was a true scientist!

I didn’t get much of a chance to talk with him, but as I rode down the elevator at one point he was going up the other side, and said "Oh, Phil, good! I want to talk to you later about something!" I’ll be honest: I have no clue what he wanted to say, as we didn’t get together after that. But just having him recognize me and call me by name made me feel like a teenager all over again. It made me want to do better science.

Goofy? Maybe. But that’s the way I felt, and I still recognize the ability of actors to play characters who can inspire us.

I know there are other scientists out there who were urged along in their studies by Victor Bergman. And so, to the man behind the Professor: Mr. Morse, I salute you. And I thank you.

Picture of Barry Morse as Victor Bergman from Space:1999

42 responses so far

Feb 05 2008

Try some skepticism; you’ll like it

Published in Cool stuff, Skepticism

My friend Karen Stollznow has written a nice, compact synopsis of skepticism on her blog. I like it! It has some NSFW language, in case you have delicate sensibilities. But, if you do have delicate sensibilities, I’m guessing skepticism may not be for you. It takes a lot of personal fortitude to withstand the usual slings and arrows from people who prefer fantasy to reality, of course.

But you know what? There’s a lot of stuff about the Universe that’s not much fun to think about, either. Scary stuff, unpleasant stuff, depressing stuff, ugly stuff. Skepticism makes you face that starkly, frankly, and unflinchingly.

But on the plus side, you get to see the man behind the curtain (or the lack thereof). You get to understand the secret, you get to perceive the underlying cause, you get to grok the intricate connections, you get to absorb the unfiltered beauty.

You get to see things the way they are, and not the way you wish they were. That’s skepticism, and it’s a good thing.

77 responses so far

Feb 05 2008

Doctor Who Season 4 premier: March 22?

Published in Cool stuff, Time Sink

I was just sitting here wondering when the new season (#4) of Doctor Who will air in England, and it appears that info is hard to find! The website sylvestermccoy.com seems to say the new series will start on March 22, but I can’t confirm that after searching the BBC site. Any Brits in whoblogland know anything?

Another thing: I’ve noticed that the BBC America versions being aired here in the US are very different than the ones aired in the UK. Whole lines of dialog are cut; in "The Runaway Bride", for example, the very important parts of the final scene where Donna admonishes the Doctor have been totally removed ("You need someone to pull you back"). I think that’s an aspect of the Doctor the new series is exploring quite well, and it’s a shame that BBC-A isn’t going that way. I don’t know if the SciFi channel is cutting those scenes or not; I’d rather eat my own head than watch that horrid channel. If I see one more ad for a made-for-SciFi channel movie about some monster they found in the dictionary I’ll shut my TV off forever and start, I dunno, reading or something.

77 responses so far

Feb 05 2008

The reality of 2007 TU24

Published in Astronomy, Cool stuff, NASA, Science

Sigh. I keep getting scooped. I’ve been meaning to write about what we learned in the actual real world about the asteroid 2007 TU24 — the one that missed us at the end of January and had no effect on us despite the cries of doom from others — but then Sean Welton of Visual Astronomy went and wrote up a good blog post about it!

So go read what he said. And check out JPL’s stuff too.

16 responses so far

Feb 05 2008

WD5 missed Mars? Maybe.

Published in Antiscience, Astronomy, Science

I was just sitting here a little while wondering if the asteroid WD5 missed Mars, and if it did, how much did its orbit change. Then I fired up my feed reader and saw that Emily wrote about this in her usual thorough and interesting manner, thus obviating any need for me to so, other than point you to her. So there. Bottom line, though: it almost certainly missed, but its orbit changed quite a bit, we probably won’t recover it for years, but it’s a small rock and space is big, so it doesn’t pose much of a danger to anyone.

So, any doomsday criers out there (I’m looking at you, TU24dotORG): give it a rest.

12 responses so far

Feb 05 2008

The galaxy that ate Detroit

Actually, it’s The Galaxy That Ate A Whole Lot Of Other Galaxies… And Got Gas.

Check it, babies:

Hubble picture of elliptical galaxy NGC 1132

This new Hubble picture release (American version) of the elliptical galaxy NGC 1132 has some way cool stuff going on. Usually, when I see a new Hubble image, I like to look at it for a few minutes and see what I can see before reading the actual text. I do this to see what I can figure out on my own, but also so that I don’t get prejudiced by the press release. The PRs are generally very good, but if I read it first I may bias myself against seeing something that I would otherwise miss.

In this case, I was pretty close. My first thought was, big deal, an elliptical galaxy. They are very pretty and very interesting, but generally not worth a press release. But then I spotted something odd: the core is very bright. Hmmm, is it an active galaxy? Maybe the supermassive black hole in the core of NGC 1132 is furiously gobbling down matter, and spewing out vast amounts of energy in the process.

Then I looked at the Chandra X-ray image (superposed on the visible light image taken by Hubble):

Chandra picture superposed on Hubble picture of the galaxy NGC 1132

Hmmm, the core isn’t that bright. Active galaxies, as a rule, have tons of X-rays pouring out of the center, and the core would be the brightest thing in the X-ray image. So NGC 1132 isn’t active, or is at best mildly active. Then I noticed the weird distribution of X-rays. X-rays usually come from very hot gas in galaxies, and ellipticals tend not to have much gas in them. Also, most ellipticals, if they emit X-rays at all, tend to have a nice symmetric distribution of them. It would look like a smooth cloud of light surrounding the center.

That’s not the case here! The gas is lumpy, and there’s a lot more "above" the core than "below". Hmmm… Aha! NGC 1132, I says to myself, says I, is a giant elliptical. It has been busily eating other galaxies, building up its mass. Now it’s huge, and the asymmetric distribution of X-rays indicates how the hot gas inside has been roiled up by collision after collision of smaller galaxies.

Bingo!

From the press release:

In visible light NGC 1132 appears as a single, isolated, giant elliptical galaxy, but this is only the tip of the iceberg. Scientists have found that NGC 1132 resides in an enormous halo of dark matter, comparable to the amount of dark matter usually found in an entire group of tens or hundreds of galaxies. It also has a strong X-ray glow from an abundant amount of hot gas – an amount normally only found in galaxy groups. Its X-ray glow extends over a region of space ten times larger than the 120,000 light-year radius it has in visible light. An X-ray glow that is equal in size to that of an entire group of galaxies.

Kewllllll. Galaxies tend not to live alone: they usually travel in groups. The Milky Way, for example, lives in a smallish cluster called the Local Group, which has us, the Andromeda galaxy, the Triangulum galaxy, and a few dozen smaller galaxies (what my Mom would call pitzulahs, "little things"). When you travel in packs, collisions are likely, and over time a medium size galaxy can swallow lots of little ones to become a Monster Galaxy.

NGC 1132 is such a monster. Like I said before, ellipticals tend not to have much hot gas, but NGC 1132 is lousy with it. It got all that matter by eating smaller gas-rich galaxies. As they spiral in to the galaxy’s center, their gas is stripped away where it becomes part of the bigger galaxy. Furthermore, the gas gets stirred up, which heats it enormously. Eventually, the smaller galaxies fall to the core and are fully absorbed, building up the mass of the gourmand galaxy’s heart (which is why it looks bright in the visible light Hubble image).

NGC 1132 is also quite huge, bigger than the Milky Way (which has eaten its share of smaller galaxies over time too), and sits in a vast cloud of dark matter - normally invisible, but in this case revealing itself by its gravitational effect on the stars in the elliptical itself (actually, to be honest, I’m guessing how they found it: there are many ways to detect dark matter, but the venerable method is to measure the velocities of the stars in the galaxy, which are affected by dark matter; stars move faster when more dark matter is present in a halo around the galaxy). The amount of dark matter detected is way more than usually seen for a single galaxy; more evidence that this galaxy has been busily gobbling up companions — and their dark matter, too.

The final nail: the galaxy is surrounded by zillions of globular clusters. These are collections of stars, sometimes with a million or more stars in them, packed into a tight ball shape sometimes only a few light years across. Giant ellipticals tend to have lots of globulars, which survive the acts of galactic cannibalism, changing allegiance from their original galaxy to the bigger one (globulars are pretty but fickle). The Milky Way has over 100 globulars around it, another indication that we too are the big guy on the block, but at the cost of dozens of other galaxies’ existence.

It’s amazing to me that just by critically examining one or two images of a galaxy we can see so much; so much of the galaxy’s present, so much of its past. And we can be confident of our interpretation! It just takes practice… and of course centuries of slow but solid scientific progress to bring us to the point where we can understand the Universe we live in.

And appreciate its beauty too. NGC 1132 is pretty.

23 responses so far