Archive for May 8th, 2007

Letter from Henry Waxman to Mike Griffin re: White House influence

When the Democrats took back the House in 2006, Henry Waxman (D CA) took over as chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform committee (actually, when he took it over, the word "Oversight" was not in the committee’s title, as his predecessor had removed it — I mean, hey, after all, why should the government need oversight?).

Waxman has been very, very busy trying to find out just where the government - both Congress and the White House — has stepped over the line of the law. Recently, it came to light that the White House has been giving presentations to government agencies and using these as platforms to promote the Republican party. That is a very bad no-no. So on April 27, Chairman Waxman sent out letters to many Agency heads, asking if there have been any shenanigans, and that includes a letter sent to NASA’s Mike Griffin.

I figured BABloggees might be interested in this. It’s not an indictment of anyone at NASA, just a letter to see if the White House has been pushing a political agenda.

Dear Administrator Griffin:

I am writing to request information about political briefings given by White House officials to federal agency officials.

On March 28,2007, the Committee held a hearing during which Lurita Doan, the head of the General Services Administration, testified that White House officials in the Office of Political Affairs conducted a political briefing at GSA headquarters on January 26,2007. The briefing slides, which the Committee reviewed, identified the Republican Parfy’s top electoral targets in the 2008 elections. After the presentation, Lurita Doan asked her staff to discuss how GSA resources could be used to help “our candidates” in the next election.

An article in today’s Washington Post reports that White House officials now confirm that, in the past year alone, at least 20 similar briefings were given to officials of at least 15 federal agencies, including the Interior Department, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Commerce Department, among others.

To assist with the Committee’s continuing investigation of this issue, I request that you provide information about any briefing mentioning elections or candidates provided to agency employees by officials in the White House between January 20,2001, and April 26,2007. Please provide the dates, times, attendees, and locations of these briefings, as well as any communications and documents relating to the briefings. Please provide these materials to the Committee by May 18,2007.

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is the principal oversight committee in the House of Representatives and has broad oversight jurisdiction as set forth in House Rule X. An attachment to this letter provides additional information about how to respond to the Committee’s request. I would appreciate your cooperation with this request.

I’ll be curious to see what happens here. A little while back, Administrator Griffin made a speech where he thanked Tom Delay (who is allegedly a major crook, but also a big supporter of NASA since he was a Representative from the district where Johnson Space Center is) and said, before Delay resigned, "He’s still with us and we need to keep him there." Many people interpreted that as an endorsement, for obvious reasons, which is also a no-no. It was a simple mistake on Griffin’s part — I don’t think he was really trying to stump for Delay, he was just endorsing someone who was a friend of NASA. Nevertheless, it was a violation of the Hatch Act, which restricts political appointees from politicking. It was a minor violation and no big deal, but it can’t be fun for Mr. Griffin to have to get the letter he did from Henry Waxman. I’m sure right now there are other things on his mind!

Update– The U.S. Office of Special Counsel investigated Griffin’s remarks, and found that he lacked judgment in making them, but nothing worse. Interestingly, they also investigated a broadcast on NASA Select by John Kerry, and also found it violated the Hatch Act; it looks like someone at NASA relied on "incorrect advice" and outdated NASA guidelines. Thanks to commenter JR Keller for pointing this out!

We’ll see how this plays out. This White House has been absolutely shameless in its suppression of science and its promotion of fundamentalist religion at NASA and elsewhere. It may be that no one spoke to any NASA employees and nothing will come of this particular letter. But the letter was sent to the heads of 26 other agencies, so we’ll see what happens.

May 8th, 2007 7:31 PM by Phil Plait in NASA, Politics | 18 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

Patrick Moore blows it, big time

In England, there is a long, long tradition of public outreach in astronomy. The leader of this is beyond a doubt Sir Patrick Moore, a man who is the UK version of Carl Sagan. His show, "The Sky at Night", has been running for decades, and he has made the skies accessible to everyone.

So I am very disappointed by comments he made today:

British TV standards are deteriorating because the BBC is “run by women”, astronomer Sir Patrick Moore has said.

[…]

The presenter said: “The trouble is the BBC now is run by women and it shows soap operas, cooking, quizzes, kitchen-sink plays. You wouldn’t have had that in the golden days.”

[…]

“I used to watch Doctor Who and Star Trek, but they went PC - making women commanders, that kind of thing. I stopped watching.”

This kind of misogynism is truly shocking to read, especially from such a distinguished and respected gentleman. I won’t even bother debunking this kind of trash; if it isn’t self-evident to you, then I won’t waste my breath.

A couple of years ago I was invited to go on the show as a guest of Sir Patrick’s — he is a Moon hoax debunker as well — but we couldn’t work out the details. Now I won’t go on even if they ask me again. It’s a shame, really, but since he’s made his views public, I don’t see much of a need to endorse him, tacitly or otherwise.

Tip o’ the monocle to Teek — who is a strong woman and worthy of my respect.

May 8th, 2007 2:12 PM by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Piece of mind, Rant, Science | 126 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

Not so close encounter

What is this???

An insect and the Moon? A UFO near a streetlight? A Photoshop job?

Nope. It’s the International Space Station, passing near Venus in broad daylight.

How cool is that? It was taken yesterday by the accomplished photographer Etienne Simian of Saint Martin de Crau from the south of France. He was using a relatively modest 8″ telescope and a webcam, which amazes me. You can actually make out details on the station! Venus, if you have been living in a basement the past few weeks, is glowing like a beacon in the west after sunset, incredibly bright. You can see it fairly easily in the daytime if you know just where to look.

The space station orbits the Earth, and you can find out if it passes overhead at your location by using any number of planetarium software packages (my favorite way is to go to Heavens Above). I go out several times a month to see it pass across the sky, in fact. For M. Simian, it happened to sail very near Venus… I looked up Venus’s stats, and it’s about 17 arcseconds across, so the ISS was about 5 arcminutes away when this image was taken. For comparison, the Moon is about 30 arcminutes across in the sky, so this was a very close encounter! But only apparently: the station was a few hundred miles from the photographer, but Venus was about 90 million miles away.

Some close encounters aren’t as close as you might think.

Tip o’ the chapeau to Larry Klaes, and to Spaceweather, which is hosting that image.

May 8th, 2007 11:42 AM by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Pretty pictures, Science | 19 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >